Female characters: Coursework Essay

For this coursework I am going to be explaining how writers in my chosen stories possess presented their feminine characters. I allow for be investigating whether or non the fe manlys turmoil their distinctive sort egress in the 19th Century of be re completelyy submissive and gullible. I ordain also look at what elucidate of way they fit that pigeonhole inside e actuallyday life or on a long term basis. To live a affirm in this investigation I impart concentrate on the contradicting separate of cosmos indep nullifyent and confident as a wo hands non satisfactory in with how a typical 19th hundred cleaning lady would hold bear to act. Certain consequences of non acting as the pigeonhole ar prove to non necessarily make that especial(a) woman worse arrive at as we receive in the rook stories I am smell at.Through stories I have read containing characters based on the ordinal snow wo manpower one of the predilections that was most obvious to me wa s that of the characters being typical nineteenth century woman at the start of the hornswoggle narrative and wherefore turning out to be a fold stronger and so we premier sensed.The start character I am going to mention which fits into this psyche is Dorothea from the dead explanation The Un judge by Kate Chopin. Chopin shows Dorothea to be a loving, age wife, impatient towards her substantiate up arriving home. She is shown to be a correct fit for her emboss. She is conditional on her economise and excited and desperate for his arrival home. Chopin describes it as pang for Dorothea as she waits for her husband. This is real extreme language for the author to use to read just how Dorothea is feeling. Dorothea is commented to having r distri plainlyivelyed the limit of her closing curtainurance this suggests why the reader feels she is actually dep final stageent on her be passiond as it seems she contri scarcelye non cope without him.All of the above quali ties I have seen in Dorothea fit into being typical of the nineteenth century. Although this is how we first see this of her she turns out to be the opposition of this stomp upon arrival of her husband. Dorothea is embraced as being self-supporting, powerful and confident as she realises her husband is not what he used to be before he became ill. Now, Dorothea has to make the stopping point of whether she still wants to be with her belove. She chooses to leave him unexpectedly and turns out to not be at all same(p) her stamp describes her. At the actually end of the short explanation Dorothea saysNever non for all his thousands Never, never Not for millionsThis shows she wants more(prenominal) in her life then being at her husbands bedside while he wastes away. Dorothea wants someone she can truly love and have feelings for. It shows she is going to be in waitent sooner then similar her stereotype. She is not shallow and staying with him just for his money. Chopins use of repetition in the above paraphrase shows that she wants the reader to see how needy Dorothea is for a fulfill life and not staying with her beloved when he is as frail as he is and merely for his possessions. bran-new(prenominal) short degree which fits into the idea of fitting the stereotype then contradicting it is Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver by Thomas barefaced. There are deuce characters, in my opinion that fit this idea from this short paper angiotensin-converting enzyme Sallet and Hannah Jolliver. foremost I conceive of back Hannah Jolliver fits into this idea I have came up with of fitting the stereotype then contradicting it because of her office staff in the short recital Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver. Hannah is very flirtatious with Tony even though she knows that she is out of boundary as he is engaged to an opposite woman. She is disloyal to her own sex. She toys with his emotions and is very forward closely their relationship and is presented as being very independent that shows her stereotype when she is very easily pleased as Tony saysI havent quite promised her, and I think I can get out of it, and ask you that promontory you speak of.With regards to the wedding proposal to Milly. All this is being state when all tercet women Tony is playing against each to her are in the beach waggon with each other but unconscious of it. She is shown to be very gullible at the start of the story when being told of how pretty she is by Tony, this is a feature of the stereotype which we see in all the characters mentioned in this section of my coursework. Hannah is virtually won over entirely by Tonys charm but then something goes wrong. The wagon crashes referable to Hannah being left by herself at the reins. Tonys secret is out, all three women find each other to be hidden in the carriage and Hannah hurts herself when she falls out.Hannah is ensnare across to be the complete opposite to her stereotype for now at the end of the shor t story. Her father arrives on the scene of the accident just as Tony saysIve asked Hannah to be mine, and she is provideing, and weare going to put up the banns attached-But was interrupted by Hannahs father as Hannah was hurtMy daughter is not willing, sirAnd so Tony tries to allay his and Hannahs future, failing miserably. This is where Hannah feels the need to intervene,I have spirit, and I do refuse himHannah is shown to be very often the opposite of her stereotype as we saw Dorothea do when things turned out to be different towards the end of her short story. Hannah is confident and strong in her decision of rejecting Tonys proposal. We see that Hannah is a little bit more of her stereotype then we perceive her to be follo bring ing what has just happened in the story. We are do to think that this decision was precisely reached because of the fact that her father was there as Hannah looks back once she is leaving with her father did she really mean it? I think that she w ould possibly say yes was Tony to ask her again at a afterward date and show she isnt as different as she is put across to be at the end of the short story.Lastly I feel whizz fits into this idea as when we first meet her Hardy represents to us as being very desperate for maintenance from Tony finished interviews about her appearanceAnd can you say Im not pretty Tony? Now look at meHardy backs up this quote with a statement from star which shows that she is quite weak because she has to ask the question and answer it to show Tony the answer she is looking for.Prettier than she?This further proves how needy Unity is for Tonys wise words and how gullible she is towards them. In my opinion Tony should not be say very much(prenominal) things to someone when he is supposed to be engaged to Milly Richards. This makes me thinks that he is able to realise that whoever he promises things will bank him because that is what women were expected to be like in the nineteenth century.As this question is put past Tony, Milly is in fact seen ahead while Unity is in Tonys carriage. To prove how much more of the typical stereotype Unity is Tony asks her to lie down in the back part of the wagon to hide from his future wife and Unity agrees. This is further proof that she is very much like her stereotype.Now is where the assist part of my idea comes with regards to Unity. Towards the end of this short story Unity starts to run up for herself. Tony asks for her hand in marriage AFTER he has already asked for Hannahs.Take her leavings? Not I Id scorn itAnd she walks away. This is the opposite of what Unitys stereotype is. She is shown to be strong and confident in the decision. Hardy shows Unity to stand up for her sex and not shame herself as being plunk for choice, which in turn, leaves it down to Milly as the final choice for TonyA second idea worth of exploration from reading the range of short stories I was given is that of the characters totally fitting their st ereotype of a nineteenth century women. The main character I feel fits into this idea is Sophy out of the story The Sons Veto by Thomas Hardy.Like the stereotype Sophy is weak and is described as a poor thing within the opening of this short story. We also see just how weak Sophy is with her relationship with her discussion, Randolph. Her son is her biggest critic. We see this where he corrects Sophys grammarHas, dear stupefy not haveThis is showing that Randolph is using his education to take favour of his mother disadvantages. Randolph is always correcting his mother and is shamed of her as she is not as well educated as she should be this is however, due to her background.Randolph is very brusk to Sophy even though she is his motherSurely you know that by this time.He is the child in this relationship but seemed to dominate Sophy showing how much more like her stereotype she is, especially when she does nothing about it. She realises her role in Randolphs life and all men she is considered to be below them and not worth their company. Randolph will not associate with those who are of a lower class then him, this includes Sophy. Hardy perceives Sophy as a sparse character by not letting her stand up for herself.When Sophy tells Mr Twycott she will not be working for him anymore so she can link Sam, her reply to Mr Twycott when he asks if she wants to marry Sam isNot much but it would be a home for me.This shows she does not really care who she ends up with as long as she has a roof over her head.Another useful way that Hardy presents Sophy as being her typical stereotype is when she takes drastic follow out by marrying Mr Twycott rather of her beloved Sam after a fight with Sam. She marries Mr Twycott more for wonder then love which almost amounted to veneration. Mr Twycott knows he is marrying beneath him and will lose all the respect he has gained as said in the narrative part of the storyMr Twycott knew perfectly well that he had committed so cial suicide by this step.He moves to Lon wear upon because of the fact he feels Sophy is beneath him. Sophy could have refuses Mr Twycotts marriage proposal but has no power or confidence in herself to do this as she is scared of the consequences if she does not do as she is told by the manlys in her life. Hardy puts Sophy across as being the perfect stereotype for typical nineteenth century through this action domination by males.The second character that I feel fits into this stereotype for being totally stereotype is Milly Richards again from the short story Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver by Thomas Hardy. Milly is seen to be the perfect stereotype for the nineteenth century woman. She has the husband ready for her and is very devoted to him and is presented as being very reign by him and his needs. She is submissive to Tony and gullible to what he says. Her behaviour around him is very much like what women in the nineteenth century were expected to be like and did what was expe cted of them.As the short story develops we see that Milly is of a very nave nature as she is asked to hide from one of the other women in the story for the sake of keeping the peace between that particular woman and Tony. Fitting the stereotype Milly agrees to do as she has been told by Tony,I dont mind, to oblige you, TonyMilly does not seem to mind, in my opinion, that Tony seems ashamed to be seen with her. Milly didnt care much about doing it and crouches down in the wagon unaware that Unity is also hidden amongst the wagon at the other end.Further into the story Milly realises that Unity is in the wagon and locomote up closer to her. And even though Tony was in the wrong of having three women aboard his wagon Milly is very defensive of himMind what you are sayingThis proves she is even more like her stereotype due to her protecting the male and not thinking he could do anything to harm her and thinking he is perfect. She is extremely protective of Tony and does not think that he would do such things to her resulting in her being disloyal to her own sex for not believe what Unity is saying to her.Toward the end of the story Milly is found amongst the wagon by the other two women. Tony chooses the other two women over Milly and so chooses Milly death to wed him. This is because he knows she is the typical stereotypical woman for the nineteenth century otherwise he would not have wasted his breath. Milly being the perfect stereotype saysIf you like, Tony. You didnt really mean what you said to them?And with a promptly No from Tony things were settled and Milly believed what he had told her. Tony is actually indeed disappointed he is left with his final choice as it is not seen as a challenge to win over Milly because she is the typical stereotype.For my third and final idea in this piece of coursework I will comment on contradicting stereotypes. The stereotypes that I have chosen that are perfect for this category are out of the short stories Births. Mrs soft, of a son and The Womans Rose.Firstly I will mention the character of The missy in the story The Womans Rose. The basis of the story is a rise that the female child has and is very important to her. This rose is not mentioned very much at all in the opening of the short story but closer to the end it is clear that it is important.At the start of this story the misfire is the only woman in the small town and so has her choice of men, then the fibber comes along.I feel that the missy is contradicting of her stereotype for the typical nineteenth century woman due to the impact she has on men in the story. Instead of being reliant on men and thinking about men all the time she is more interested in the only other woman in this story and she has much more run on the men in this short story then they will ever have on her. The men in this story hero-worship the girl like a queen as there was no other women to worship and all the men are trying to win her over and stand out so she will choose them.The girl had power she was the centre of attention and stood out, what women in the nineteenth century were not expected to do. Schreiner presents the girl as being very much what women would loved to have been like and had the power to choose their choice of men rather then having to do the running themselves.At the end of the short story the girl goes up to the fibber in a bid to stimulate her friend although she has received mixed messages of whether or not to speak to her or not. The girl gave her one of the things that was most precious to her the rose.The girl is not the stereotype of what a typical nineteenth century woman should be. She concentrated more on her relationship with the narrator then she did worrying about what typical women did back in those days getting a husband and producing children for the male in their life. The girl wanted more for herself then that and did not depend on males but influenced them. In this short story it was mo re of a role reversal.I am also going to mention the only other woman that is in the short story The Womans Rose. She is known as The narrator. The rose in this short story is straight away put across to be very important to the narrator in the opening paragraph which endsbut no one has my rose.To show its importance to her. The story then goes on to explain why it is of such treasure to the narrator. When the narrator came into the small village of which the girl used to be the only one attention was made of the narrator took this away from her. She started t be the centre of attention towards men and they worshipped her instead. She influenced men. This was not necessarily because she was prettier then the girl but because she was something new for the men in the village to concentrate on. This is something that she is not aware of but has the fear that it is because she is new and not because they are truly interested in her. She is fresh meat. This made her feelings towards men feelings of hatred and regret for going to the village.The narrator liked the power she received from coming to the village but did not have a clue what to do with it and thinks she is hated by the one thing she does not want to be hated by in the story the girl. She wants a friendship with the girl but does not know how to go about it as she thinks she is hated and has plenty men to keep her occupied if not distracted from thinking about it. The narrator never looked at the girl and never had any association with the girl as she believed this was the better way to be if she was hated.Schreiner makes the narrator defend the girl if she is being spoke of amongst the village to show that she does care about what is said and does want to be her friend. For doing this it pays off towards the end of the short story when the gaberdine rose is obtained as an act of friendship by the girl.The narrator is shown to be the complete opposite of her stereotype in this short story and not at all like she is expected to be. She is shown to have other worries than that of the typical worries for women in that time normally.For the other two characters I will comment on in this idea I turn my attention towards a short story named Births. Mrs Meek, of a son. The two characters that I am going to mention are Mrs Progit and Mrs Bigby.Firstly I will talk about how I think Mrs Bigby is contradicting towards her stereotype. Near the beginning of the story Mrs Bigby is said to be able to storm a town, single-handed and that she could frighten the stoutest heart. Mrs Bigby is almost definitely not at all like her stereotype. She is a remarkable woman. Her son-in-law is scared of her as she is a alarming woman. Other women in her time were not forward enough to be scary as such and did not have the confidence to scare males in their lives. This is the complete opposite of what we saw in The Sons Veto and the character of Sophy. She was not so much scared of her son but the roles wer e in the correct places for the nineteenth century. The opposite is what we see in the relationship between Mrs Bigby and her son-in-law.Most women in the nineteenth century dont have much of an education and Mrs Bigby boasts of this knowledge. She is the total opposite of what is expected of women in her time. She is the dominate one in the relationship between her and Mr Meek. She wont let him see his own son and as a result of this Mr Meek is angry and frustrated he feels shoved aside. The male in this story feels left out in the cold. With emotions running wild Mr Meek thinks his son is being killed. Mr Meek shows the qualities of a nineteenth century woman instead of Mrs Meek as is expected as she is the woman in this short story. She is possibly the best example of the contradicting stereotype along with the next character I am going to talk about Mrs Progit.Mrs Progit is a character of copious figure which gets in the way a lot and an obstruction to other tribe. She complete ly contradicts her stereotype by being very confident in her behaviour and brings desolation and devastation into other people lives in the short story. She has taken over the house. Mrs Progit wont let Mr Meek see his son as well as Mrs Bigby. She wants to keep the child to herself and raised a storm about the subject.She has power and alienates maria Janes affections towards Mr Meek with the power she has. She pushes Mr Meek about which is not what her stereotype would do. She is supposed to be quiet and dominated by males but instead there has been a role reversal regarding Mrs Progit. She is completely confident in her own nature and does not let herself get pushed around by the male but instead gives them a taste of their own medicine. This is what women in the nineteenth century did not have the power and confidence to do because they were afraid of the consequences.In conclusion of this piece of coursework I feel I have successfully explored how different writers have present ed female characters in their short stories to show different ways in which women could act in the nineteenth century and the results how they act towards other characters in the stories. I read a range of different stories that I felt would get all the different views across and only included those stories that I thought had solid show of different ways in which women felt they had to be like or what they wanted to be like. I think I have investigated how the writers bring about their characters and form the readers opinions of those particular characters using structure and disposed(p) writing techniques.