Comparison of Solar and Wind Energy Technologies

equality of solar and Wind Energy TechnologiesContents (Jump to)CHAPTER 3solar and wind technologies comparison3.1 Economics of technologies3.1.1 Cost of photovoltaic Cells3.1.1 Economics of wind turbines3.2 Efficiency of technologies3.3 Advantages and disadvantagesCHAPTER 4RESULTS AND DISCUSSION4.1Results4.2DiscussionCHAPTER 5CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION5.1Conclusions5.2RecommendationREFERENCESCHAPTER 2Solar and Wind Technologies Comparison3.1 Economics of technologiesInstalled cost and performance levels of renewable susceptibility plants are similar approximately the world, although no single figure screwing quantify the precise cost and performance of any renewable technology. The location where the technology is installed plays a major(ip) role in providing the efficiency resource for renewable push button technologies. Solar installations close to the equator have much postcode production capability. Wind energy variations are more extreme, windiest regions are favora ble to install wind turbines that puzzles significant amount of electrical energy such(prenominal) as New Zealand and United terra firma (Freris and Infield, two hundred8).Table 3.1 shows the primary(prenominal) parameters related to renewable energy technologies and conventional plant. It as well indicates the three major components of energy generation cost which are (1) the cost of the plant, land acquisition, grid radio link and initial finance cost, (2) operation and maintenance cost (OM) and finally fuel cost. From the table it is noticeable that close to of the renewable energy technologies have zero fuel cost and it varies in conventional plant.Table 3.1 Comparison of cost and performance data for renewable energy and conventional plant (Freris and Infield, 2008)Levelized cost method is the main traditional approach used to compare cost generating electricity from various energy technologies. The levelized cost of energy technologies is measured as it is shown in com parability 3.1LOCE = (Eq. 3.1)The LCOE method is concept from reality and is used as a ranking tool to measure the cost-effectiveness of various energy generation technologies. Where CF is the capacity factor OC is the long construction cost CRF is the capital recovery factor OMC is the series of annualized operation and maintenance costs FC is the series of annualized fuel costs r is the discount rate and T is the economic life of the plant.3.1.1 Cost of photovoltaic CellsSolar radiation is a finite and free source of energy but despite that, in that location is cost for utilizing this form of energy. The calculation of the cost of solar energy can be do in the following manner. Assuming the solar carcass would have a specific lifetime of T years at initial cost of C0 Dollar. The amount of energy the system can generate during the lifetime of the system is Q (Goswami et al., 2000). The unite cost of energy, neglecting the interest charges, is equal to the cost of the install ation divided by the total energy generated during the lifetime as it is shown in Equations 3.2 Cs = (Eq. 3.2)For example if the solar energy collector cost $200/m2 , has an expected life of 20 years, and is installed in a location where the mean annual horizontal aerofoil irradiance is 300 W/m2 averaged over 24 hours, the cost of solar energy Cs allow be equal to= = $0.00380/Kw.hrHowever it is clear that no solar energy collector can perform at 100% efficiency. According to thermodynamic laws only a fraction of incident energy can be transformed into useful heat. Assuming the efficiency of the collector c is 40 percent, the cost of solar will be given by Equation 3.2Cs = = $0.00951/Kw.hr (Eq. 3.3)The efficiency of photovoltaic device plays a major role in the cost of the technology as we notice from the previous equation along with the heart of the device. The footing of photovoltaic materials is usually expressed on a per-unit-area basis but the units are practically change based on cost per watt that is generated under peak solar illumination conditions. Equation 3.4 is used to convert the cost per square meter to cost per watt for photovoltaic technologies$/WP = (Eq. 3.4)The return on enthronement made for specific equipment or material used for the photovoltaic system also is estimated. The retribution time of PV unite of cost $/m2, is associated with the efficiency of the system, the installation location and the price of at which electricity generated is sold on the market $/kWh. Equation 3.5 is used to estimate the payback time which isPayback time = (Eq. 3.5)The generate a significant quantity of energy in commercial application, several elements should be mainly considered such as the average illumination, cost of land, batteries, support structure and the life time of the PV unite. Balance of system (BOS) cost must be considered and it includes the mounting, wiring, operation cost and maintenance cost. The cost of electricity generated by solar cells can be calculated using Equation 3.6a and name 3.1 illustrate breakdown of the cost in PV system. type 3.1 PV Solar System Cost Breakdown (Source the Rocky Mountain Institute) (Eq. 3.6a)Inserting the relevant terms, in Equation 3.6a and it becomes = (Eq. 3.6b)The amortisation rate is estimated from the real discount rate of i, and a PV lifetime, N, as shown in Equation 3.7Amortization = (Eq. 3.7)The spherical annual production of solar energy technologies is estimated to be at approximately 12,400 MW in year 2007. annual issue of PV production remains to be at 40-50% and according to Earth Policy Institute, the photovoltaic diligence has grown by an average of 48% each year since 2002. This rapid growth of PV production made the solar energy became the world fastest-growing renewable energy resource (Henry and Healey, 2007).The wide sort of photovoltaic dialog boxs technologies competing in different energy markets was a major role in the rapid growth of sol ar energy technologies in a short period of time. For instance, largescale photovoltaic panels and severe solar power technologies are competing with other technologies that seek to serve the centralized grid. Whereby on the other hand, minor solar systems compete with other types of technologies such as diesel generation sets and off-grid wind turbines (Timilsinaa et al., 2012). Along with the variety of PV technologies, with the advancement of science and technology sector, the efficiency and power generation capacity of solar technologies have been amend to generate electricity that can compete with the conventional sources power plants.photovoltaic technologies have been experiencing, the price of PV models harbour been steadily decreasing during the past few decades. A lot of elements such as Technology good using lower cost feedstocks, efficiency increases, thinner solar cells, reduction in technical losings and increased manufacturing through had played a major role in d ecreasing the cost of PV modules throughout the years (Sioshansi, 2011). Figure 3.2 shows the downslope in photovoltaic panels price per watt from 1978 until 2012.Figure 3.2 Historical photovoltaic module price per watt from 1978-2012(Source Navigant Consulting, 2008)From the Figure3.2, the price of PV modules were at it maximum in 1976 with 75$ per watt but in year 1978 the price drop to reach almost 55$ per watt. PV modules price kept decrease with the time passage and between 1986 and 1988 the price of PV module reached below the 10$ per watt. The declination of PV modules cost did not stop and between years 2010 and 2012 the price reached the lowest rate which was 1$ per watt.Photovoltaic technology system have no moving parts, this property reduces the cost of PV modules significantly along with the lower limit operation and maintenance costs (mainly to remove the dirt and dust off the module) which is around 0.5% of the capital investment per year. The cost of PV unit present ly is 60% of the total cost of PV system cost and the remaining 40% is covered by the structures, inverters and cabling costs (Aswathanarayana et al., 2010).ReferencesHenry M. and Healey P.E (2007) Economics of Solar, Cogeneration Distributed Generation Journal, vol. (22), no. (3), pp. 35-49, DOI 10.1080/15453660709509122.Timilsinaa, G. R. Kurdgelashvili, L. and Narbel, P. A. (2012) Solar energy Markets, economics and policies, vol. (12), pp. 449-465.Print Book Freris, L and Infield, D. (2008) Renewable energy In power systems, United Kingdom John Wiley Sons, Ltd.Print Book Goswami, Y. Kreith, F. and Kreider, J. F. (2000) Second Edition Principle of Solar Engineering, New York, US Taylor and Francis groupingPrint Book Sioshansi, F. P. (2011) Energy, sustainability and the environment Technology, incentives, behavior. Oxford, UK Elsevier Inc.