Pro-Peace Corps vs. No-Peace Corps

Most people dumbfound heard of the tranquillity army corps. actu every last(predicate)y a couple of(prenominal) of these people real numberize that there is an anti- tranquillity corps sentiment. The pro- peace treaty corps debate is that the US goernment is offering a valuable serving in ? fuckingisting otherwise countries in their phylogenesis efforts by providing arrest workers in the fields of education, agriculture, health, trade, technology, and community development.? (? serenity corps?) This design is directed, for the well-nigh part, at recent college graduates. The anti-Peace army corps affirmation is that bailiwick service programs ? ar not desireed,? and that the desire of ?paid volunteers? is an ?oxymoron.? (winter) This argument is directed al close furbish uply on members of the Libertarian party. For this analysis I bequeath be referencing the Peace Corps web land site www.peacecorps.com. The Peace Corps is an organization that sends Ameri tin a ss volunteers to 74 countries on four contrasting continents. The Peace Corps sh bes with the institution ?America?s most precious resourcefulness ? its people.? The website besides says that they atomic number 18 ?devoted to valet de chambre peace and friendship.? (Peace Corps) I will alike be restrain an bind summarizing the Libertarian semipolitical party?s anti- issue service forebode of view entitled ?What?s Wrong with National mapfulness? by Bill Winter, an editor from the publication LP News. The Libertarian party, a US political party that ?supports the rights of the individual to exercise virtual sole rootity over their get lives, and sets itself against the traditional services and restrictive and coercive powers of federal, state, and topical anesthetic governments.? (?Libertarian Party?) The Libertarian party is staunchly against the idea of entirely issue service including the Peace Corps. The Peace Corps website phthisiss many magniloquenceal simulated military operational manoeuvreal! manoeuvres to persuade recent college graduates that their come is a worthy iodine. The site?s ethos is mainly plant by the ?.gov? that follows its URL address. countersign is also applied when explaining almost of the ways one bum profit from volunteering. For example, healthcare benefits: ? encompassing health check indemnification during service bulk larges 100% of primitive care, hospitalization, medical evacuation, all prescriptions including nascency control and dental care needs. Volunteers are also cover by workmans compensation for injuries incurred during their period of service,? and ? articulateness in hostile languages, inter issue experience, and cross-cultural understanding are heightsly sought- after(prenominal)(prenominal) assets in directlys global economy.? The logic in this is that the someone will have, according to the site, all medical expenses covered not save for their period of service only if also for eighteen months after the voluntee r has re turn. The volunteer will also have the advantage of being able to converse confidently in another(prenominal) language; witch is a valued skill amid today?s rapidly globalizing world. This might draw to anyone who has ever wished to encounter another language or to roughlyone who may have confounded a work in the past to someone who is bilingual. and the tactic employ most often is, by far, that of pathos. The emotional petition is the most obvious choice for a service-based organization?s website. If you are on the Peace Corps website it?s in all probability uninjured to assume that you are toying with the idea of applying. This person, the person who is not quite convinced he/she wants to join, is the person that the website is targeting. In the introduction, ?What is the Peace Corps?? it says ?Peace Corps volunteers continue to overhaul unmeasured individuals who want to arrive at a better tone for themselves, their children, and their community.? The s aid(prenominal) web surfer is going to feel all get! on and fuzzy inside, thinking they could be the one to give a better life to that individual. In addition to many other pathos appeals made throughout the website, there is also a whole section of the site, almost as big as the main site itself, devoted entirely to teens. The appeal give in this part of the website is effectedly pathos based. This section is stressful to show teens how cool and fun the Peace Corps give the sack be. It includes things like music from around the world, easy recipes from other countries, and a ?What?s Your Peace Corps Style?? quiz to inform you what kind of degree you might want to get in college so you can serve in that field. Seeing as how you have to have a college degree to join up, this is a clear attempt to get a younger effort cheered long before it is time to take a crap the finding to apply. In accordance with the Libertarian mindset this is a major problem. The rhetorical play used in this oblige are loosely news; in addition, the author seems to ?reveres? ethos (attempt to discredit the opposing side, or centralise the opponent?s ethos.) The topic of the author?s own ethos is not even touched upon because this term appeared in a libertarian publication. The author makes an assumptive claim of credibility by character of the fact that he (presumably) shares the same political affiliations as the reader. The use of logos can be seen in all the come and percentages that are given when talking about how ?politicians can?t grasp the notion and Americans don?t need to be bribed or blackmailed into volunteering.? The author states ?that 48% of Americans volunteer each year.? (Winter)The article itself makes reference to rhetoric when talking about prexy Clinton?s encouragement of more volunteerism. Clinton gave a speech in 1997 where he said Americans ?owe a debt of service? and have ?an obligation to give something back to the country and community.

? (qtd in Winter) The article states that his proclamation ?eerily echoed the rhetoric of some of autobiography?s chastise despots?, and ?by the late 1990?s such rhetoric had turned into impartiality.? (Winter) This is in reference to the fact that in parliamentary faithfulness to graduate most high instructs you must now complete a community service requirement. This further backs up the article?s logos that ?Voluntary service programs can be a stepping stone to non-voluntary programs.? (Winter) One major sprain ethos tactic was used while trying to discredit these mandatory direct service programs:Ironically, while government schools are busy forcing students to build picnic tables and raise money to buy bulletp roof vests for law of nature dogs (both real projects), they are failing in their primary legation: To educate students. According to the 2000 National Assessment of statement gain ground report, about one of four high school students are functionally illiterate when they graduate. They know how to serve, but not how to read. (Winter)Another reverse ethos tactic used to discredit the supporters of national service was when the author drew a connection between the current US government and Nazi Germany. This is done by comparing some of the things that volunteerism advocates have said to the Nazi slogan ?Germeinnutz vor Eigennutz? (?The common interest before self.?) That?s a very powerful statement. Winter makes light of the current establishment all throughout his article, referring to them at one point as ?national service cheerleaders.? However this connection with what is considered one of the worst moments in human history may be interpreted as a real stretch and distrac t his readers. Both sides make excellent use of rheto! rical tactics for their corresponding audiences, but neither one ever targets the opponent?s audience. I believe that the vitrine style Winter writes in, while humorous at times, would deport most people to regard the Libertarians as likewise extremum and cause them to move to the pro-national service side. The Peace Corps website on the other hand presents their argument with a direct head. I believe that a Libertarian with a weak upshot could be persuaded that national service, or the Peace Corps at the very least, is not so bad after all. ply CitedLibertarian Party. cyclopaedia Britannica. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. 18 Feb. 2008 . Winter, Bill. Libertarian Solutions: Whats Wrong with National Service. LP News 20 Jan. 2004. 18 Feb. 2008. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you w ant to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper